Cover of The Wanderer

This one was high on my TBR as it has appeared on several lists of the classics in the genre. Unfortunately, the novel didn’t follow through with the promise, and I was hard-pressed to make it through. 

The structure of the story is written like a cheap disaster b-movie with a large ensemble cast spread around the globe. Their stories don’t converge - this is a mosaic narrative where their personal experiences compound together to paint a rich perspective on the unfolding catastrophe, which is the focus of the story rather than any one character.

I understand this structure was relatively groundbreaking at the time, and when Leiber focuses on the unfolding chaos he does a solid job. When it comes to characters and dialogue, it’s a different story. Everyone is incredibly annoying, stupid, stereotypical, and frankly borderline mentally ill. Dialogue is frequently jarring - people just wouldn’t talk that way - and Leiber often breaks the flow to show how clever he is or make an in-reference to science fiction. A lot of really irritating people die in the course of this novel and I found myself glad when they did - not quite the desired effect! 

Leiber’s portrayal of women and relationships is awful by today’s standards. On the back of my copy there’s a quote from Sturgeon: “All his true loves are worked into the book: cats, astronomy, the theater, people, and well, girls.” Yes, Sturgeon, you’re right to feel slightly embarrassed. 

I can’t recommend this - as a disaster novel it’s an interesting historical note, but there’s not enough here to be worth your time.

First published
1964
Author
Fritz Leiber (1910)
Genre
Science fiction
Open Library
ISFDB
Wikidata
🏆 Won: Hugo Award for Best Novel, 1965